Family Law, Succession and Inheritance, Gender Violence, Real Estate and leases, Administrative Law.

phone icon+34 91 310 36 33
divider

Court confirms the acquittal of tuitero accused of glorifying terrorism,,es,Chamber II of the Supreme Court dismissed the appeal by the prosecution against the judgment of the High Court issued last,,es,Lump Arkaitz acquitting Vives crime of praising terrorism for several tweets published between,,es,The high court noted that criminal punishment of the conduct of exaltation or justification of terrorist acts or their perpetrators requires,,es,as a manifestation of 'hate speech',,es,a situation of risk to people or third party rights or freedoms system itself,,es,and argues that this situation did not occur in this case,,es,European legislation on hate crimes,,es

separator

Court confirms the acquittal of tuitero accused of glorifying terrorism,,es,Chamber II of the Supreme Court dismissed the appeal by the prosecution against the judgment of the High Court issued last,,es,Lump Arkaitz acquitting Vives crime of praising terrorism for several tweets published between,,es,The high court noted that criminal punishment of the conduct of exaltation or justification of terrorist acts or their perpetrators requires,,es,as a manifestation of 'hate speech',,es,a situation of risk to people or third party rights or freedoms system itself,,es,and argues that this situation did not occur in this case,,es,European legislation on hate crimes,,es

/ 0 Comments /

La Sala II del Tribunal Supremo ha desestimado el recurso planteado por la Fiscalía contra la sentencia de la Audiencia Nacional dictada el pasado 21 de marzo de 2017, que absolvió a Arkaitz Terrón Vives del delito de enaltecimiento de terrorismo por varios tuits publicados entre 2011 and 2015.

El alto tribunal destaca que la sanción penal de las conductas de exaltación o justificación de actos terroristas o de sus autores requiere, como una manifestación del ‘discurso del odio’, una situación de riesgo para las personas o derechos de terceros o para el propio sistema de libertades, y defiende que dicha situación no se dio en este caso.

Normativa europea sobre delitos de odio
In the judgment,,es,the Supreme analyzes the crime of praising terrorism Article,,es,the Penal Code which was imputed to the defendant,,es,Explain what,,es,Although the Spanish legislature is autonomous when typing behavior,,es,It is taken into account what is established in the regulations of the Council of Europe in relation to the conduct interpretable as a criminal offense by glorifying terrorism,,es,And it is that European legislation provides that the sentence for glorifying terrorism is an illegitimate intrusion into the field of freedom of expression when demonstrations defendants prosecuted not pose,,es,even indirectly,,es,according to the doctrine of the Constitutional Court,,es 52/2018, el Supremo analiza el delito de enaltecimiento de terrorismo del artículo 578 del Código Penal que se imputaba al acusado. Explica que, aunque el legislador español es autónomo a la hora de tipificar conductas, ha de tenerse en cuenta lo que viene establecido en la normativa del Consejo de Europa en relación a la conducta interpretable como constitutiva de delito por enaltecimiento al terrorismo.

Y es que la normativa europea establece que la condena por enaltecimiento al terrorismo resulta una intromisión ilegítima en el ámbito de la libertad de expresión de los acusados cuando las manifestaciones enjuiciadas no supongan, ni siquiera indirectamente, una situación de riesgo para las personas o derechos de terceros o para el propio sistema de libertades

Por ello, de acuerdo a la doctrina del Tribunal Constitucional, it required that prior to the imposition of a sentence by Article,,es,the Penal Code in the court decision ponder whether the conduct developed by the defendant integrates a manifestation of hate speech,,es,Lack of incitement to violence,,es,In this particular case,,es,the Supreme believes there is no proof that from the tweets published by the defendant "has been generated or are potentially suitable for minimally increase the risk of commission of terrorist offenses",,es,The high court specifies that the context in which the tweets were issued always coincide with some event or event transpires an alien relative and critical encourage any violent incitement,,es 578 del Código Penal se pondere en la resolución judicial si la conducta desarrollada por el acusado integra una manifestación del discurso del odio.

Falta de incitación a la violencia
En este caso concreto, el Supremo considera que no existe prueba de que a partir de los tuits publicados por el acusado “se haya generado ni sean potencialmente aptos para que incremente mínimamente el peligro de comisión de delitos terroristas”.

El alto tribunal especifica que el contexto en el que se emitieron los tuits siempre coincidía con algún suceso o acontecimiento relativo y trasluce un ánimo crítico ajeno a cualquier incitación violenta.

The high court transluce hence its unusualness "for lack of an objective type element composed of the Constitutional Court,,es,beyond which he is the legislature's intention,,es,to enable a constitutional reading of the sanctioning rule contained in Article,,es,the Criminal Code ",,es,The court unmade the idea that crime has occurred humiliation of the victims of terrorism,,es,and arguing that "leaving aside the qualification or ethical judgment that such black humor worthy,,es,from typical consideration for our analysis,,es,the charge being strictly an offense included in the section on terrorism,,es,it is obvious,,es,alluded to Irene Villa,,es, más allá de cual fuere la intención del legislador, para posibilitar una lectura constitucional de la norma sancionadora contenida en el artículo 578 del Código Penal”.

El tribunal deshecha la idea de que se haya producido delito de humillación de la víctima de terrorismo, y argumentando que “con abstracción hecha del calificativo o juicio ético que tal humor negro merezca, desde la consideración típica que nos corresponde analizar, siendo la acusación estrictamente por un delito incluido en la sección dedicada al terrorismo, resulta obvio, que se alude a Irene Villa, determined exclusively as a person with disability,,es,regardless of the specific cause that generated ",,es, al margen de la causa concreta que la generó”.

noticias.juridicas.com

separator